Rethinking the 4% retirement rule in America

Rethinking the 4% retirement rule in AmericaMany experts in America believe the oft-cited “4% withdrawal rule” for retirement still holds up.

The basic premise is that if pensioners withdraw 4.5% of their savings each year, their inflation-adjusted nest egg should remain for 30 years – the average time span used in retirement planning.

Yet now, some experts are beginning to doubt this commonly held wisdom – pointing out that in today’s market, portfolios might not be bearing the same returns.

‘Out of touch’

Devised by financial planner William Bengen in the 1993, the research analysed every 30-year retirement period since the 1920s – a long time period where portfolios were constantly earning around 8%.

The culmination of the research showed that, for portfolios which reserved 40% of their holdings in US bonds and 60% in large-company stocks, the portfolio could bestow withdrawal rates at around 4.15% for an (inflation-adjusted) 30-year span.

Yet currently, portfolios normally earn a lot less – say around 4%.

In addition, today’s stocks are expensive, something historically linked to below-average performance.

Therefore several financial advisers are now eliminating the usefulness of the 4% rule – claiming it doesn’t concede to today’s reality – that of prolonged, and low returns.

Three options

Two options now favoured by retirement experts are the deferred income annuities, which will pay a yearly income which starts later in life – say around age 85 – or immediate fixed annuities, which would begin paying out when you retire.

Ranging from 5% to 6% of the amount paid for the annuity, the annual income – together with Social Security – should be able to cover basic living expenses. However, if the market goes south, your fund will be affected, and your provisions may not last as long as you need them to.

Another options is to use life-expectancy tables – such as those provided by the Internal Revenue Service.

Taking your fund balance from the 31st of December from the year prior, you then look up your current life expectancy in the Internal Revenue Service table, and divide your pension pot by your predicted retirement duration.

You can then use this figure as a basis for your monetary limit for the year.

The downside to this approach is that your withdrawals will fluctuate year on year – however this does provide you with a measured chance of outlasting your savings.

The next step

Due to the modern problems and pitfalls, the most important aspect of your retirement to focus on is having the flexibility to withstand life’s obstacles.

Whilst financial planning would be easier if each person could precisely predict their own lifespan, other options need to be explored.

To ascertain which product or service is the best answer to your needs, you should speak to a regulated independent financial advisor.

About John Cassidy

You can find me on Google+ and other social sites coming soon